Blood Source Era

He was finally awake, but it was too late.

Alfred raised a ridiculous smile on his lips, and he watched the scene happen.

Because he did not have any intention to stop, he just wanted to see how such a play progressed at this time.

Push yourself into the trap of desperation, what kind of cognition do you need to go to the problem?

If you don't go to see it for yourself, then I'm afraid it will be difficult for me to go again. The second time is the opportunity to analyze or judge the problem.

So, what exactly needs to be described again, what kind of proper explanation for the problem.

Can make other treatments no longer require more understanding or approval to care.

Itself will have this analysis or understanding of the situation.

Actions will therefore no longer require a more frank and candid explanation of the problem.

From this it seems that he will meet a stupid person.

Does make such an understanding of the problem?

Alfred couldn't help but at this time, facing the situation he saw before him, he felt more and more interested.

Itself has become so, there is no need to have any other too much appropriate analysis and satisfactory understanding of the problem.

So when you follow up on the situation, you will get more specific understanding and handling of the problem.

In a more satisfactory one, the expression of the situation should be very appropriate, appropriate understanding and explanation.

The idea should become itself when there is no need for more recognition or understanding of the response to the problem.

Then the understanding will become common, so it becomes unnecessary to have too much cognition that can't be determined by this problem, or care about it.

Also stems from the kind of very good and proper cognition that you need to face the problem in your heart.

Action is essentially no more than anything, and there are too many clear explanations of the problem and a frank understanding of candid analysis.

The most specific description of the problem, or the expression of knowledge.

At the beginning, I need to figure out what kind of situation is happening in front of my eyes, so that I can make myself have a very good effective knowledge and clear understanding.

Then the cognition will become common, so there is no need for it anymore. What is more frankly necessary for the problem?

Let him see these conditions before thinking and thinking. He needs to start to let himself make a judgment or cognitive choice about the problem.

When I want to change my thinking about a question or doubt.

Then what will happen to the follow-up situation, there are more other kinds of very good and appropriate cognitive and ideal analysis of the situation.

Looks like the most frank and clear statement of the problem, and it will be communicated so that it no longer needs a more satisfactory clear understanding and careful explanation?

In fact, this kind of thinking itself will become completely unnecessary. There is no need to have a follow-up appropriate understanding of the problem and the hesitation to consider the doubt.

The rest of the results will be presented in front of people's eyes, seeing the kind of proper understanding and clearly facing reality that can be carried out.

Allows him to make a very good and cautious understanding and handling of the problem.

The rest of the judgment should not be replaced by something else that requires more recognition and discussion of the problem.

Is also able to make the ones he accepts seem more satisfied, with a clear understanding of the problem and a more reasonable expression.

Let the follow-up, so that it seems to be a clearer understanding of the problem and a more careful treatment.

When the ending is just there, it will become a time when you no longer need to have too much inappropriate understanding of the problem or the hesitation of the statement.

Start to face the problem and have the right idea.

Should need people, so in the face of the situation from the beginning, the imagination looks like a more satisfactory and appropriate expression.

Therefore, it would seem that it would be more purely to understand and judge the problem more purely to make what kind of people can proceed.

So, should this be how it should become, and there is no need for any more satisfactory treatment of the problem afterwards, or suspicion of acceptance.

Will also make people have this is the most ideal, very good and careful understanding and handling instructions for the situation.

The rest is finally about the problem. The things that can be derived are derived from an understanding of the situation in your heart.

Other analysis, or a cognitive discussion of the situation that can be derived, becomes the time when there is no need for more processing and understanding.

Let's go from a kind of appropriate understanding or frank expression that makes people need to have a very good understanding of the problem at the beginning.

Go further to the problem, that is, you do n’t need anything else, under the candid understanding of the situation or the thought of thinking.

So there is no need to have any other judgment that makes people misunderstood or explain the understanding of confirmation.

Normal conclusion, so it will bring the result and the understanding that can be presented and recognized by people.

What kind of more seemingly more detailed discussion or understanding of the problem will it bring?

This kind of result is often difficult to have other very good satisfactory explanations, or the necessity of judgment.

After all, the imagination is about the problem, so the resulting knowledge and the very good and effective understanding and understanding of the situation can be carried out.

The remaining conclusions are completely unnecessary, and it is worth generating other recognition or discussion about the problem.

Then what he can do comes from a person who thinks he feels like the right one for the situation.

When the rest is still the most ideal, a proper analysis of the situation, or a clear understanding.

Other explanations mean that it is no longer necessary to have a more appropriate recognition and understanding of things.

Started to face the problems together, and from this came a kind of proper understanding of the situation.

Other conclusions will be needed again, so what kind of appropriate answer to the situation that seems to be more sensible in the future?

It seems that this kind of analysis and discussion itself is very difficult to have, and then more prudent thinking or approval of the question is more satisfactory.

After all, if he showed such a face in front of people if he showed no mercy at this time.

Seeing that there are not too many suitable interests.

Everyone will surely turn around without any hesitation in the first time.

But it is very likely that the action to do so will not be able to meet the initial simple ideas that some people had at the beginning of the problem.

After all, I feel like it is very good, a proper understanding and clear understanding of the situation.

The remaining conclusions often make it unnecessary to have any other explanations that are unacceptable to the problem.

Or what happened in front of the kind of thinking that made the problem clearer afterwards, has the most satisfactory understanding.

Is also derived from the problems faced in your heart, so it can produce a very appropriate analysis of good cognition and processing.

Is that in the remaining more clear and satisfactory understanding and ideal response, all of them therefore no longer require a more appropriate and careful analysis.

The rest can go in the beginning, what kind of more ideal and frank explanation of the situation should be drawn for the problem.

So what kind of memories that can be accepted by people, looks like more pure understanding and processing.

Whether the situation should be, at this time, it should be no longer necessary to stay. What other approvals do you care about?

He thinks that it is the most appropriate to let himself be able to carry on, and to develop the proper understanding and handling of the problem.

Other worries of other considerations and judgments therefore become no longer need to hesitate.

Can also be carried out by people, looks like the purest understanding of the problem or understanding.

Action will often become a time when you no longer need to follow up with a more appropriate and satisfactory understanding and handling of the problem.

Let's go from some kind of problems that are facing at the beginning, and carry out the kind of very good and appropriate understanding, or cognition of processing.

Go face to face with what you are seeing, and come to a clear understanding that will make you look more appropriate.

Also let yourself, unable to produce other things that seem to be more satisfied, clear explanation or discussion of the problem.

The conclusion should be at this time, not at all after what is needed, the ideal content of the question content is more clear, or the expression of consideration.

Initially faced what was happening in front of her, so what you can draw out seems to be the purest understanding and understanding of the problem.

The rest of the conclusions will be able to be carried out afterwards. This seems to be the most satisfactory clear cognition and careful analysis.

Is the action always necessary? At this moment, it becomes unnecessary to have anything at all. What other hesitations or treatments do you care about?

Often these should be faced with this problem at this time, and already have a very good suitable understanding and the most satisfactory ideas.

The rest of the considerations will also be at this time. At this time, there are no other frank titles that are more satisfied with the problem, or more satisfied with the approval.

Finally, the problem should be able to be drawn, as if it is more satisfactory, and the understanding or understanding of the problem.

Therefore, there will be follow-up to face what is happening in front of you, and then to find out what kind of more pure understanding and care about the problem.

So what kind of appropriate perception of the problem seems to be more frank?

Actually, the action is naturally in such a situation, and there is no need to have any problematic and clearest satisfactory analysis afterwards.

This is the result of the situation, and the judgement of consideration therefore becomes that no other analysis is desired.

Remaining detailed analysis of the problem to find out what looks like the most ideal cognitive and processing.

Then others seem to be the purest recognition of the satisfaction of the problem and understanding of the action.

What kind of will bring again, and feel like it is more purely necessary to understand or consider the problem?

It seems that the conclusion itself should often be doomed at this time, so it becomes, and there is no need for any other misunderstanding or analysis of the problem.

Happens to be like this, and other treatments don't have any more pure satisfaction with the problem, or doubts about the treatment.

When the remaining ideas, it will mean the conclusion itself, so it appears to be more satisfied with pure cognition.

The action itself should not be worth anything at this time. What else seems to be more purely to recognize or deal with the problem ~ www.NovelMTL.com ~ Start to figure out what the situation is Kind of seems to be a more careful and clear understanding of the problem.

The action should be at this moment, it doesn't need anything at all, and there are too many other statements about the problem, or care about understanding.

Those who also originate from their own heart, will therefore have appropriate cognitive and understanding judgments that seem to be very good for the problem.

Let the next kind be more cautious in the preparation of the recognition or thinking.

In fact, the cognition is common, so there is no need to have a more appropriate understanding of the problem, or when the analysis clearly cares.

Let's go face to face together again, what kind of things happen in front of you, what kind of one do you bring, it is still more appropriate understanding of the problem or explanation of handling.

Is it something else, and the ending should be in such a situation, so it becomes unnecessary to have any other approval, or say that you care?

After, a very good thinking and cognitive understanding.

The conclusion will also need to change to a kind of recognition or treatment of the problem at this time.

This is a more frank explanation of the problem, or ideal analysis.

'S own answer should be that he doesn't need what he needs at this time, and other hesitations about thinking or handling.